Kajian Modalitas dalam MoU Helsinki Nota Kesepahaman Damai antara NKRI dan GAM

Authors

  • Medri Osno Kantor Bahasa Kepulauan Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v10i2.16

Keywords:

MoU Helsinki, modality, modulation

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find the modalities contained in the Helsinki MoU and the reasons for modalities with the most dominant percentage of emergence. The type of this research is qualitative with descriptive statistics. Data collection uses the method of listening with the note techniques. The data analysis method uses a combination of the method of aggregation and the equivalent method which refers to the Halliday LFS analysis model. The technique used is a technique of sorting direct elements or BUL techniques. The basic technique of the matching method used is the sorting determining element or PUP technique. The modalities that appear in the data are modalization and modulation. The coverage of modalities includes causality, appearance and range. Furthermore, the orientation of modalities is explicit and implicit. Modality is dominated by medium-level probability of 77.3%, high-level proposition of 11.8%, high-level trend of 4.5%, medium-level tendency of 2.7%, and necessity of high and middle level 1.8%. These percentages indicate that most of the action have not been carried out by the Indonesian government and GAM in resolving problems in Aceh.

References

Ahmadi, F. Y. (2016). Modality Analysis of Basuki Cahaya Purnama’s Speech on Kalijodo Discourse. Gamatika, 4(2), 69—77. https://doi.org/10.31813/gramatika/4.2.2016.59.69--77

Alwi, H., Dardjowidjojo, S., Lapoliwa, H., & Moeliono, A. M. (1998). Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia (Ketiga). Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa dan Balai Pustaka.

Asaari, A., & Aziz, J. (2017). Konflik Semiotik dan Simbolik dalam Hubungan Ibu dan Anak Perempuan dalam Filem Seram Kontemporari Melayu: Kajian Kes Filem Senjakala (The Conflicts Between the Semiotic and the Symbolic in the MotherDaughter Relationship in Malay Contemporary Horror Films: A Case Study film Senjakala). GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 17(4), 274–292. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1704-18

Danesi, M. (2010). Pesan, Tanda, dan Makna: Buku Teks Dasar Mengenai Semiotika dan Teori Komunikasi. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra. Retrieved from http://jalasutra.com/bukudetil.php?id=189

Halimatussakdiah. (2010). Wacana Kepemimpinan: Analisis Fase dan Modalitas Teks Pidato Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono Berdasarkan Perspektif Linguistik Sistemik Fungsional. Universitas Sumatera Utara. Retrieved from http://repository.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/19368

Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, Ed.). Great Britain: Arnold. Retrieved from http://www.uel.br/projetos/ppcat/pages/arquivos/RESOURCES/2004_HALLID AY_MATTHIESSEN_An_Introduction_to_Functional_Grammar.pdf

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective (2nd ed.). London: Oxford University Press.

Mahsun. (2005). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nurhasim, M. (2008). Konflik dan Integrasi Politik Gerakan Aceh Merdeka; Kajian tentang Konsensus Normatif antara RI-GAM dalam Perundingan Helsinki. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Oktavianus. (2006). Analisis Wacana Lintas Bahasa. Padang: Andalas University Press.

Pusat Bahasa, T. P. K. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. (Dendy Sugono, Ed.) (IV). Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Saragih, A. (2002). Bahasa dalam Konteks Sosial. Medan: Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni Universitas Negeri Medan.

Setia, E. (2008). Klausa Kompleks dan Realisasi Pengalaman dalam Teks Peradilan (Kasus Bom Bali I). Denpasar: Universitas Udayana.

Sudaryanto. (1992). Metode Linguistik: Ke Arah Memahami Metode Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Sudaryanto. (1996). Linguistik: Identitas, Cara Penanganan Objeknya, dan Hasil Kajiannya. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

Sugiyono. (2006). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. (E. Mulyatiningsih, Ed.) (10th ed.). Bandung: CV Alfabeta.

Verhaar, J. V. M. (2010). Asas-Asas Linguistik Umum. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Wiseman, & Jacqueline, P. (1970). Field Projects for Sociology Students. Cambridge: Cambridge Schenkman.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-26

How to Cite

Osno, M. (2019). Kajian Modalitas dalam MoU Helsinki Nota Kesepahaman Damai antara NKRI dan GAM. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 10(2), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v10i2.16