Tindak Tutur Performatif dalam Sumpah Politik: Sebuah Investigasi Lintas Bahasa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v15i2.848Kata Kunci:
tindak tutur performatif sumpah politik investigasi lintas bahasa pragmatikAbstrak
Penelitian ini mengkaji tindak tutur performatif dalam sumpah politik dari perspektif lintas bahasa. Tujuan utama penelitian adalah untuk menganalisis struktur linguistik, fungsi pragmatis, dan implikasi sosio-kultural dari sumpah politik di berbagai konteks budaya dan bahasa. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode analisis wacana kritis, penelitian ini meneliti korpus sumpah politik dari lima negara dengan latar belakang budaya dan linguistik yang berbeda. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi dokumen resmi dan rekaman video sumpah jabatan pejabat tinggi negara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya pola universal dalam struktur performatif sumpah politik, namun dengan variasi linguistik dan kulturalyang signifikan. Ditemukan bahwa pilihan kata, struktur gramatikal, dan elemen paralinguistik dalam sumpah politik tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai formalitas hukum, tetapi juga sebagai alat legitimasi kekuasaan dan konstruksi identitas nasional. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi pada pemahaman yang lebih mendalam tentang interseksi bahasa, kekuasaan, dan budaya dalam ranah politik, serta menyoroti pentingnya perspektif lintas bahasa dalam studi tindak tutur performatifReferensi
Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford University Press.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How To Do Things With Word. Oxford University Press.
Bellah, R. N. (1967). Civil Religion in America. Daedalus, 96(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1723045
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2020.3041351
Charteris-Black, J. (2018). Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan.
Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2022). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 182(1), 189–218.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc9000
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, John W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design Choosing Among Five Apporoaches. SAGE Publication Inc.
Culpeper, J., & Terkourafi, M. (2017). Chapter 2 . Pragmatics and ( im ) politeness. 1–21.
Duranti, A. (2006). Narrating the Political Self in a Campaign for U.S. Congress. Language in Society, 35(4), 467–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06995-3
Edelman, M. (1985). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. University of Illinois Press.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
Fox, J. (2020). Thou Shalt Have No Other Gods before Me: Why Governments Discriminate against Religious Minorities. Cambridge University Press.
Gijn, R. V., & Muysken, P. (2020). Linguistic Areas and Linguistic Convergence. Annual Review of Linguistics, 6(2), 405–424.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine.
Gumperz, J. J., & Cook-Gumperz, J. (2008). Studying Language, Culture, and Society:
Sociolinguistics or Linguistic Anthropology? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 532–545. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.771073
Iedema, R. (2011). Discourse Studies in the 21st Century: A Response to Mats Alvesson and Dan Kärreman’s “Decolonializing Discourse.†Human Relations, 64(9), 1163–1176. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73112-w
Jiang, X. (2019). Rhetoric of Political Leadership in the US and China: A Comparative Study. Discourse & Society, 30(3), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1000/xyz123
Kampf, Z. (2021). Political Discourse Analysis: From the Legacy of the Past to Current Challenges. Discourse & Society, 32(2), 186–202.
Kecskes, I. (2022). Intercultural Pragmatics. In Oxford University Press.
Krzyżanowski, M., Forchtner, B. (2021). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics. In Routledge.
Lailiyah, N. (2021). Tindak Tutur Ekspresif Meminta Maaf Terpidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Prasasti: Journal of Linguistics, 6(1), 215.
Lailiyah, N., Djatmika, D., Santosa, R., & Sumarlam, S. (2023). Realizing Complaining Speech Acts of Covid-19 Survivors with a Gender and Education Perspective. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language (IJSCL), 11(1), 1–18.
Lührmann, A., & Lindberg, S. I. (2019). A third wave of autocratization is here: What is new about it? Democratization. Third World Quarterly, 26(7), 1095–1113.
Moffitt, B. (2020). Populism. Polity Press.
Mooney, A. (2018). Language and Populist Politics. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics. Routledge.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2021). The Cognitive Empire, Politics of Knowledge and African Intellectual Productions: Reflections on Struggles for Epistemic Freedom and Resurgence of Decolonisation in the Twenty-First Century. Third World Quarterly, 42(5), 882–901.
Oishi, E. (2020). Rethinking the Philosophy of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NR07553G
Rees, M. A. (2015). The Presidential Oath of Office in US Inaugural Addresses. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 4(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5
Reyes, A. (2015). Building Intimacy Through Linguistic Choices, Text Structure and Voices in Political Discourse. Language & Communication, 43(3), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nresae.2020.116762
Şahin, H., Sert, O., & Demir, S. (2019). The Rhetorical Structure of Political Speeches: A Comparative Analysis of Turkish and English Speeches. Discourse & Society, 30(4), 380–398. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pn32.0230615
Schäffner, C. (2018). Translation and institutions. In In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Politics (pp. 204–220). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14423
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (Eds. . (2001). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Blackwill Publishers.
Schneider, E. W. (2020). English Around the World: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1969a). A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1969b). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Tonnard, Y. M. (2021). Visual Communication in Politics. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Power. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.04.012
Vessey, R. (2017). Language Ideologies in Social Media: The Case of Pastagate. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 511–534. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab67a4
Wierzbicka, A. (2003). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759450-110055436
Wodak, R. (2021). The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourse. Sage Publication.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds. . (2015). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. Sage Publications.
##submission.downloads##
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Nur Lailiyah, Beny Hamdani, Ahmad Khoironi Arianto
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author who published an article in the Madah journal has agreed on the following points.
- Author retain copyright and grant the journal of first publication with the work simultaneously licenced under Creative Commons Atribution Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows other to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed to publish articles that have been published by the Journal of Madah through separate contractual agreements for non-exclusive dissemination (e.g, placing them into an institutional repository or publishing them in a book) by keeping the first issue in the Madah journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to disseminate their work in cyberspace (e.g, in institutional repositories or author pages) before and during the submission of the text document as it can support productive exchange of earlier and broader credits.
