PERBANDINGAN CERITA “MAHLIGAI KELOYANG†DAN “KOBA MALIN DEMANâ€
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v7i1.121Keywords:
“Mahligai Keloyangâ€, “Koba Malin Demanâ€, comparison, dynamic structuralismAbstract
Many folklores have same motives, but different in development adjust to the community that support the story. Differences in the development of the story in folklore shows the influences of local cultures to the storyteller. The differences cause various versions of folklore. It is also seen in folklore Mahligai Keloyang from Indragiri Hulu Regency and Koba Malin Deman from Rokan Hulu Regency. Therefore, this study aimed to find the similarities and the differences of the two folklores. The analysis of the similarities and differences of The legend Mahligai Keloyang and Koba Malin Deman applied dynamic structuralism theory, the theory which does not only emphasizes the intrinsic elements, but also pay attention to extrinsic elements in literature. Due to the fact that the study was also intended to compare two folklores, the research method used is descriptive comparative method. Based on the analysis of the structure of the story, it is found that there are similarities and differences in the stories Mahligai Keloyang and Koba Malin Deman which includes elements of the theme, the characters, the settings, and the plots. Based on the analysis of the cultural values in the folklores, some similarities and differences of religious values, moral values, and social values are found.References
Amanriza, Ediruslan Pe, dkk. 1989. Koba Sastra Lisan Orang Riau. Pekanbaru: IDKD.
Danandjaja, James. 1984. Folklore Indonesia: Ilmu Gosip, Dongeng,
dan lain-lain. Jakarta: PT Temprint.
Djamaris, Edwar. 1993. Nilai Budaya dalam Beberapa Karya Sastra Nusantara; Sastra Daerah di Sumatra. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan
dan Pengembangan Bahasa; Depdikbud.
Feronika. “Hikayat Malim Demam: Analisis Intertektual.†(http://etd.
repository.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitiandetail&sub=Penelitia
nDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=72723 diakses 2 Januari 2016).
Kurniawan, Muh. Aridian. “Analisis Alur Cerita Sabuk Bidedari dan
Jaka Tarub.†(https://manusiabatu.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/analisi
s-alur-cerita-sabuk-bidedari-danjaka-tarub diakses 2 Januari 2016).
Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 2006. Teori Pengkajian Fiksi. Gadjah Mada Universty Press: Yogyakarta.
Rahman, Elmustian dan Fakhri. 2003. Mahligai Keloyang dan Sejumlah
Cerita Lainnya. Pekanbaru: Unri Press.
Rampan, Korrie Layun. 1984. Suara Pancaran Sastra. Jakarta:Yayasan Arus.
Ratna, Nyoman Kutha. 2004. Teori, Metode, dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sabakti, Sri dkk. 2015. “Versi dan Varian Cerita Rakyat Riau.†Laporan Penelitian Kelompok. Pekanbaru: Balai Bahasa Provinsi Riau.
Sayuti, Suminto A. 2000. Berkenalan dengan Prosa Fiksi. Yogyakarta:
Gama Media.
Sudjiman, Panuti. 1992. Memahami Cerita Rekaan. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author who published an article in the Madah journal has agreed on the following points.
- Author retain copyright and grant the journal of first publication with the work simultaneously licenced under Creative Commons Atribution Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows other to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed to publish articles that have been published by the Journal of Madah through separate contractual agreements for non-exclusive dissemination (e.g, placing them into an institutional repository or publishing them in a book) by keeping the first issue in the Madah journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to disseminate their work in cyberspace (e.g, in institutional repositories or author pages) before and during the submission of the text document as it can support productive exchange of earlier and broader credits.







