Kesantunan Berbahasa Siswa dalam Berdiskusi

Penulis

  • Fitria Cahyaningrum Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta
  • NFN Andayani Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta
  • Budhi Setiawan Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v9i1.150

Kata Kunci:

students' language politeness, linguistic politeness markers, discussion

Abstrak

Discussion activities can be an effort in improving students' speaking skills through the disclosure of ideas and opinions about a problem. However, sometimes the use of language that is less polite when students express their opinions still appears. There is a need for polite discussion with proper diction when interacting with others. This study aims to describe the form of students' language politeness in class discussions and the characteristics of lingual marker. The method used is descriptive qualitative research with sociopragmatic approach. Data are in the form of students' speech in discussion. Technique of collecting data is by recording technique with free listening method (SBLC). Data analysis techniques use interactive model in the form of data collection, data reduction, data analysis, and conclusion. The results show that there are tact maxim, generosity maxim, approbation maxim, modesty maxim, agreement maxim, and sympathy maxim.  The characteristic markers of linguistic politeness are “silakanâ€, “tolongâ€, “maafâ€, “terima kasihâ€, and “mariâ€.

Referensi

Anggraini, B. (2005). Faktor-faktor Penanda Kesantunan Tuturan Imperatif dalam Bahasa Jawa Dialek Surabaya: Analisis Pragmatik. Jurnal Humaniora, 17(1), 67—77.

Creswell, J. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications, 448. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aenj.200 8.02.005

Gojkov, G. (2010). Facilitating Effective Student Learning through Teacher Research and Innovation. (M. V. dan V. J. Zuljan, Ed.). Ljubljana: Faculty of Education.

Halid, E., Mahaputera, U., & Yamin, M. (2017). Kesantunan Berbahasa Dalam Kegiatan Diskusi Mahasiswa Angkatan 2016 Program Studi Diii, (1), 1—8.

Hamalik, O. (2001). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Kridalaksana, H. (1993). Kamus Linguistik (Edisi keti). Jakarta: Gramedia.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Mahsun. (2012). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Miles and Huberman Chapter 2. In Qualitative Data Analysis (pp. 50— 72).

Parera, J. D. (1988). Belajar Mengemukakan Pendapat. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Rahardi, R. K. (1999). Imperatif dalam bahasa Indonesia: Penandapenanda kesantunan linguistiknya. Humaniora, MeiAgustu(11), 16—23.

Searle, J. R. J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. East. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1017/CBO9781139173438

Sumarlam. (2017). Pemahaman dan kajian Pragmatik. Surakarta: Bukukatta.

Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction: Go to the people. In Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.) (Vol. x, p. 337). http://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R l75

##submission.downloads##

Diterbitkan

2018-04-26

Cara Mengutip

Cahyaningrum, F., Andayani, N., & Setiawan, B. (2018). Kesantunan Berbahasa Siswa dalam Berdiskusi. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 9(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v9i1.150

Terbitan

Vol 9 No 1 (2018): Jurnal Madah

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

The author who published an article in the Madah journal has agreed on the following points.

  1. Author retain copyright and grant the journal of first publication with the work simultaneously licenced under Creative Commons Atribution Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows other to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are allowed to publish articles that have been published by the Journal of Madah through separate contractual agreements for non-exclusive dissemination (e.g, placing them into an institutional repository or publishing them in a book) by keeping the first issue in the Madah journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to disseminate their work in cyberspace (e.g, in institutional repositories or author pages) before and during the submission of the text document as it can support productive exchange of earlier and broader credits.